Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 2557 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 42% better in HITMAN 2 than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 179 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 95 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 24 vs 16 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
980
42.64577893820714%
Multi-Core
6528
65.32572800960672%
Intel Xeon E-2388G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics P750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
