Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2378 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2378 is 2557 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2378
- Performs up to 27% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 219 vs 172 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2378 - 20 vs 16 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
886
45.74083634486319%
Multi-Core
5378
67.71594056912616%
Intel Xeon E-2378 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon E | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |