Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600T outperforms Xeon E-2378 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600T is 483 days newer than Xeon E-2378.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600T
- Performs up to 10% better in Starfield than Xeon E-2378 - 74 vs 67 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E-2378 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2378
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Core i5-13600T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2378 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 14 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
