Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900HX outperforms Xeon E-2314 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900HX is 852 days newer than Xeon E-2314.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900HX
- Performs up to 7% better in Dead Space than Xeon E-2314 - 165 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2314 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E-2314 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2314 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900HX |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |