Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Xeon E-2314 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8845HS is 819 days newer than Xeon E-2314.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E-2314 - 134 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2314 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2314 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E-2314 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E-2314
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Ryzen 7 8845HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E-2314
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Single-Core
1684
67.73934030571199%
Multi-Core
4241
36.33793162539628%
Intel Xeon E-2314 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
