Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Xeon E-2276M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 180 days newer than Xeon E-2276M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 45 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E-2276M - 135 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 48 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 48 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
