Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Xeon E-2146G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 658 days newer than Xeon E-2146G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E-2146G - 137 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2146G - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2146G - 20 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€436.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €436.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Jul 12th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2146G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |