Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Pentium P6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1801 days newer than Pentium P6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6100
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 4% better in Valorant than Pentium P6100 - 694 vs 670 FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
694
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 364 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Arrandale | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |