Buy on Amazon
€71
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $5489
Availability
MSRP in USD: $5489
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Pentium Gold G6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 75 days newer than Pentium Gold G6400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 58 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 44% better in The Callisto Protocol than Pentium Gold G6400 - 125 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 128 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Pentium Gold G6400 processor 4 GHz 4 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76990 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium Gold G6400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium Gold G6400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
805
50.37546933667084%
Multi-Core
1669
11.255732398165632%
Intel Pentium Gold G6400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
| Pentium Gold | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 64 |
| 4 | Threads | 128 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
