Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Pentium Gold G6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 994 days older than Pentium Gold G6400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 58 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Pentium Gold G6400 - 181 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
175
96.68508287292818%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60801 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
805
68.56899488926746%
Multi-Core
1669
23.924885321100916%
Intel Pentium Gold G6400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Pentium Gold | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |