Buy on Amazon
€66.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium Gold G6400 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium Gold G6400 is 2746 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Performs up to 5% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-8350 - 96 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than FX-8350 - €66.99 vs €285.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-8350 - €0.7 vs €3.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 58 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium Gold G6400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
96
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
CPU Intel Pentium Gold G6400 processore 4 GHz 4 MB Cache
Buy for €66.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 364 minutes ago
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
91
94.79166666666666%
Value, €/FPS
€3.13/FPS
22.364217252396166%
Price, €
€285
23%
AMD FD8350FRHKHBX – FX-8350 CPU con Wraith Cooler AM3 + 125 W 4.0 GHz 16 MB Cache 32 nm Black Edition
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium Gold G6400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium Gold G6400 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Pentium Gold | Collection | FX |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
