Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Pentium Gold G5400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 524 days older than Pentium Gold G5400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 58 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 7% better in Lost Ark than Pentium Gold G5400 - 249 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400 - 44 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Pentium Gold G5400
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium Gold G5400
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
731
62.21276595744681%
Multi-Core
1504
15.635720968915686%
Intel Pentium Gold G5400 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Pentium Gold | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 22 |
| 4 | Threads | 44 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 145 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
