Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 637 days newer than Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 51 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 11% better in Dota 2 than Pentium G4620 - 197 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 48 vs 4 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
61.29554655870445%
Multi-Core
1599
21.587687322802754%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
| Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 48 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 250 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
