Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 638 days newer than Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Pentium G4620 - 129 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 24 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
59.41915227629513%
Multi-Core
1599
21.45156962704588%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
