Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 177 days newer than Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Pentium G4620 - 197 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 64 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | EPYC |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
