Buy on Amazon
€155.45
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4560 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4560.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €155.45 vs €288.88
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 87% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Pentium G4560 - 116 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Pentium G4560 - €2.49 vs €2.51 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4560 - 20 vs 4 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel 54W Pentium Processore BX80677G4560 G4560 Kaby Lake Dual-Core 3.5 GHz LGA 1151 Intel HD Graphics 610 Desktop
Buy for €155.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€288.88
53%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-10900F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 10 core fino a 5,2 GHz sbloccato senza grafica del processore LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 400) 65 W
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Pentium G4560
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4560 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
