Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3460 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3460 is 232 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3460
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1820 - 117 vs 116 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
116
99.14529914529915%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66403 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3460 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |