Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Pentium G3420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2433 days newer than Pentium G3420.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Remnant II than Pentium G3420 - 90 vs 80 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3420 - 16 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
90
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€255.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €255.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1611 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
584
36.22828784119106%
Multi-Core
981
13.566588300373391%
Intel Pentium G3420 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |