Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3420 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3420 is 1574 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Performs up to 1% better in Death Stranding than Phenom II X4 925 - 215 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 53 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3420 - 4 vs 2 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FPS
212
98.6046511627907%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 400 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
54.794520547945204%
Multi-Core
930
94.80122324159022%
Intel Pentium G3420 | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 925 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 11th, 2009 |
Pentium | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Haswell | Codename | Deneb |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |