Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3258 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3258 is 946 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Performs up to 0% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G3930T - 227 vs 226 FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Pentium G3258 - 35 vs 53 Watts
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
89.39641109298532%
Multi-Core
948
88.26815642458101%
Intel Pentium G3258 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 53 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
