Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Pentium G3250T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 700 days newer than Pentium G3250T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 18% better in Rust than Pentium G3250T - 185 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250T - 12 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |