Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 700 days newer than Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 53 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 41% better in FIFA 23 than Pentium G3250 - 144 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 12 vs 2 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
576
48.8135593220339%
Multi-Core
981
17.901459854014597%
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
