Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms Pentium G3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2433 days newer than Pentium G3220.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3220
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 1 than Pentium G3220 - 244 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3220 - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
244
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€139.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €139.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |