Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Pentium G3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 82 days older than Pentium G3220.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3220
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 53 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 4% better in Immortals of Aveum than Pentium G3220 - 26 vs 25 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3220 - 8 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G3220
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Pentium | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 220 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
