Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G2120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G2120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G2120.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2120
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - €108.45 vs €268.88
- Up to 20% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-11900KF - €0.44 vs €0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 101% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Pentium G2120 - 492 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G2120 - 16 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
245
49%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€108.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €108.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
492
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
80%
Price, €
€268.88
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €268.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G2120 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |