Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G2120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G2120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G2120.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2120
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €108.45 vs €288.88
- Up to 56% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i9-10900F - €0.48 vs €1.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 19% better in Lost Ark than Pentium G2120 - 267 vs 225 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G2120 - 20 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
225
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€108.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €108.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
267
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
44%
Price, €
€288.88
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G2120 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |