Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G2120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G2120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G2120.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2120
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €108.45 vs €182.44
- Up to 27% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-11600KF - €0.46 vs €0.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Ready or Not than Pentium G2120 - 288 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G2120 - 12 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
237
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€108.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €108.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
288
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
73%
Price, €
€182.44
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €182.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G2120 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |