Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Pentium B950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2202 days newer than Pentium B950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium B950
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Pentium B950 - 517 vs 500 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium B950 - 64 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium B950 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | EPYC |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 32 |
2 | Threads | 64 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |