Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms Pentium 3825U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 184 days newer than Pentium 3825U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3825U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700T - 15 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 14% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium 3825U - 169 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 3825U - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 3825U | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |