Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Pentium 2117U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1095 days newer than Pentium 2117U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 2117U
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 17 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 4% better in Alan Wake 2 than Pentium 2117U - 100 vs 96 FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
100
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 251 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 2117U | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |