Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Pentium 2020M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2320 days newer than Pentium 2020M.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 2020M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 39% better in War Thunder than Pentium 2020M - 178 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 2020M - 6 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58288 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Single-Core
396
28.737300435413644%
Multi-Core
669
13.839470417873398%
Intel Pentium 2020M | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |