Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9960X outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9960X is 261 days older than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9960X
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 242 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9960X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9960X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
76.34252539912917%
Multi-Core
3013
30.14808885331199%
Intel Core i9-9960X | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
