Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9960X outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9960X is 2244 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9960X
- Performs up to 35% better in Starfield than FX-4130 - 58 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-9960X - 125 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9960X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9960X | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
