Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 199 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G4900 - 116 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 54 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
43.595187544232125%
Multi-Core
1051
11.131116288921838%
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 165 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
