Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in War Thunder than Core i3-10320 - 197 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - €151.33 vs €455.01
- Up to 65% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-9900KF - €0.8 vs €2.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.31/FPS
34%
Price, €
€455.01
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €455.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
188
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |