Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 560 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Warcraft than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 192 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - €121.46 vs €455.01
- Up to 73% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-9900KF - €0.65 vs €2.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.37/FPS
27%
Price, €
€455.01
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €455.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19293 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
187
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €121.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19293 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Renoir |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |