Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2349 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 7% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 542 vs 507 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 45 vs 95 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
542
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€438.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €438.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4980 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | May 14th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 45 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |