Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2332 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 32% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G1610 - 584 vs 441 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
441
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |