Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1031 days newer than Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-7920X - 189 vs 177 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 105 vs 140 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1364
78.88953152111047%
Multi-Core
9102
90.74775672981058%
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 12 | Cores | 12 |
| 24 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
