Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4011 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 156% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8320 - 605 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €892.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 608 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900K | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |