Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Ryzen 5 7600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 359 days newer than Ryzen 5 7600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 5 7600 - 232 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €192.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75065 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Single-Core
2735
90.56291390728477%
Multi-Core
12259
67.09906951286261%
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |