Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 3409 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 30% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 138 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 85 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
