Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 4471 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 35% better in Remnant II than FX-6100 - 105 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
