Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 8 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 6% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-13400F - 138 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €184.0 vs €723.64
- Up to 73% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-13900KS - €1.42 vs €5.24 per FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.24/FPS
27%
Price, €
€723.64
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €723.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14604 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
130
94%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€184
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €184 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14604 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
150 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |