Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 987 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than Core i5-10600KF - 169 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €125.48 vs €607.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-13900KS - €0.81 vs €3.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 125 vs 150 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.6/FPS
22%
Price, €
€607.99
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €607.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
154
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€125.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €125.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |