Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 667 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 10% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-10105 - 239 vs 218 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €116.63 vs €607.99
- Up to 79% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-13900KS - €0.54 vs €2.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.54/FPS
21%
Price, €
€607.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €607.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
218
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€116.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €116.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |