Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10500.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-10500 - 191 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10500 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €170.2 vs €612.99
- Up to 68% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-13900K - €1.04 vs €3.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
191
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.21/FPS
32%
Price, €
€612.99
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €612.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
164
85%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€170.2
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €170.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |