Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1917 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i5-8400 - 276 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €188.88 vs €583.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i9-13900F - €0.81 vs €2.11 per FPS
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Buy for €583 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
234
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |