Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i9-13900 vs Celeron G3930

Core i9-13900 vs Celeron G3930: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900

2.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-13900, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 24 core (8 P-core + 16 E-core) Cache 36 MB, fino a 5,6 GHz

Buy for 539.09 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75740 minutes ago

vs

Intel Celeron G3930

2.9 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G3930 Logo
Intel BX80677G3930 Processore Celeron G3930, S 1151, Kaby Lake, Dual Core, 2 Thread, 2.9GHz, 2MB Cache, 1050MHz GPU, 51W, Argento

Buy for 63.66 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75739 minutes ago

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900

2.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-13900, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 24 core (8 P-core + 16 E-core) Cache 36 MB, fino a 5,6 GHz

Buy for 539.09 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75740 minutes ago

vs

Intel Celeron G3930

2.9 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G3930 Logo
Intel BX80677G3930 Processore Celeron G3930, S 1151, Kaby Lake, Dual Core, 2 Thread, 2.9GHz, 2MB Cache, 1050MHz GPU, 51W, Argento

Buy for 63.66 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75739 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900

  • Performs up to 46% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron G3930 - 161 vs 110 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 32 vs 2 threads

Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930

  • Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - €63.66 vs €539.09
  • Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
This is a free version of Grand Theft Auto V.
Grand Theft Auto V

Grand Theft Auto V

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


FPS

161

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€539.09

11%

FPS Winner

Intel® Core™ i9-13900, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 24 core (8 P-core + 16 E-core) Cache 36 MB, fino a 5,6 GHz

Buy for 539.09 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75740 minutes ago

Intel Celeron G3930 Logo
Celeron G3930

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017


FPS

110

68.32298136645963%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€63.66

100%

Intel BX80677G3930 Processore Celeron G3930, S 1151, Kaby Lake, Dual Core, 2 Thread, 2.9GHz, 2MB Cache, 1050MHz GPU, 51W, Argento

Buy for 63.66 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75739 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023

Intel Celeron G3930 Logo
Celeron G3930

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


Single-Core

2714

100%

Multi-Core

16426

100%

Intel Celeron G3930 Logo
Celeron G3930

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017


Single-Core

608

22.402358142962417%

Multi-Core

1043

6.349689516619993%

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo

Intel Core i9-13900

vs
Intel Celeron G3930 Logo

Intel Celeron G3930

Jan 4th, 2023
Release DateJan 3rd, 2017
Core i9CollectionCeleron
Raptor LakeCodenameKaby Lake
Intel Socket 1700SocketIntel Socket 1151
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
24
Cores2
32
Threads2
2.0 GHzBase Clock Speed
2.9 GHz
5.6 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
65 WTDP
51 W
10 nm
Process Size14 nm
20.0xMultiplier
29.0x
UHD Graphics 770Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 610
NoOverclockableNo

Builds Using Core i9-13900 or Celeron G3930

Grand Theft Auto V, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.