Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 2408 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 34% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G3900 - 157 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-12900KS - €60.9 vs €511.33
- Up to 84% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-12900KS - €0.52 vs €3.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 51 vs 150 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.26/FPS
15%
Price, €
€511.33
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €511.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 270 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
117
74%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 270 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900KS | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
150 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |